<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Critiques - Tag - In a past life…</title>
        <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/critiques/</link>
        <description>Critiques - Tag - In a past life…</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:34:25 &#43;0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/critiques/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>Avoiding the Pitfalls of Feedback as a Writer</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2011/03/21/avoiding-the-pitfalls-of-feedback/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:34:25 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2011/03/21/avoiding-the-pitfalls-of-feedback/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em"><figure class="alignright size-medium"><a class="lightgallery" href="/2011/03/21/avoiding-the-pitfalls-of-feedback/Stupid-Fatty-Mirror-Mark-Adams.jpg" title="Stupid Fatty Mirror" data-thumbnail="/2011/03/21/avoiding-the-pitfalls-of-feedback/Stupid-Fatty-Mirror-Mark-Adams.jpg" data-sub-html="<h2>Photo © 2006 Mark Adams CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 (source)</h2><p>Stupid Fatty Mirror</p>">
        
    </a><figcaption class="image-caption">Photo © 2006 Mark Adams CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crystalskull/447485062/">(source)</a></figcaption></figure></div>
<p>I ran across this post about how <a href="http://frootbat31.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/the-importance-of-feedback/">important feedback is to a writer,</a> by the pseudonymous &ldquo;Frootbat31&rdquo; on her blog <em>A Writer&rsquo;s Journey</em>. She makes four stimulating points regarding criticism, and how to manage it as a writer.</p>
<p>As someone who&rsquo;s gone through a career cycle of first seeking feedback (as a beginner), then trying to distinguish criticism from critique, growing to loathe feedback of any sort, and finally appreciating thought-provoking feedback&hellip; Here are some of my comments on the topic, for whatever they&rsquo;re worth.</p>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Not Taking Criticism So Seriously</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2011/03/02/not-taking-criticism-so-seriously/</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:00:35 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2011/03/02/not-taking-criticism-so-seriously/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em"><figure class="alignright size-medium"><a class="lightgallery" href="/2011/03/02/not-taking-criticism-so-seriously/Tantrum-Ed-Yourdon-faceblur.jpg" title="Sir, it really isn&amp;#039;t necessary for you to photograph my daughter when she&amp;#039;s throwing a tantrum..." data-thumbnail="/2011/03/02/not-taking-criticism-so-seriously/Tantrum-Ed-Yourdon-faceblur.jpg" data-sub-html="<h2>“Sir, it really isn&#39;t necessary for you to photograph my daughter when she&#39;s throwing a tantrum&hellip;”(Original Photo © 2010 Ed Yourdon CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) (source)</h2><p>Sir, it really isn&amp;#039;t necessary for you to photograph my daughter when she&amp;#039;s throwing a tantrum...</p>">
        
    </a><figcaption class="image-caption">“Sir, it really isn't necessary for you to photograph my daughter when she's throwing a tantrum&hellip;”<br />(Original Photo © 2010 Ed Yourdon CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/yourdon/4481569192/">(source)</a></figcaption></figure></div>
<p>The stories we write are part of us. Like children, we nurture them and raise them. We identify with them. Then we push them out into the world and hope that they make a good name for us.</p>
<p>This, I&rsquo;m sure, is why some reviewers refuse to rate books that they can&rsquo;t give at least 4 stars to (out of 5). They don&rsquo;t want to break hearts. When one reviewer gave one of my books a half-hearted 3-star review, with comments on how my characters made no sense, I became convinced that she simply didn&rsquo;t &ldquo;get&rdquo; it. Now, years later, I think she actually got it more than I had thought—rather I needed to dig deeper into my characters. Even so, I never got over that review.</p>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>The Myth of the Thick-Skinned Novelist</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:00:18 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em"><figure class="alignright size-medium"><a class="lightgallery" href="/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/Little-Wonder-Woman-Nathan-Rupert.jpg" title="Little Wonder Woman" data-thumbnail="/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/Little-Wonder-Woman-Nathan-Rupert.jpg" data-sub-html="<h2>Photo © 2009 Nathan Rupert CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 (source)</h2><p>Little Wonder Woman</p>">
        
    </a><figcaption class="image-caption">Photo © 2009 Nathan Rupert CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nathaninsandiego/3756363424/">(source)</a></figcaption></figure></div>
<p>Some years ago, when I was a fledgling storyteller still puzzling through the basics of what makes a story work (or not), I frequented a certain writer&rsquo;s forum, now defunct. One of the writers there made it very clear that when we critiqued his work, we should be positively nasty about it. He didn&rsquo;t want to hear anything soft and fluffy about how well he wrote, because otherwise how could he grow as a writer? Rather, he wanted to hear about all the stuff he did wrong. That&rsquo;s what we call &ldquo;having a thick skin.&rdquo;</p>
<p>This is a common enough view in critique groups, although I don&rsquo;t share it. I think that positive criticism can be even more useful than negative, as long as it&rsquo;s constructive. That is, if you tell the writer what she did that particularly worked (rather than what didn&rsquo;t work), you&rsquo;ll be supporting her in her strengths. That&rsquo;s even more important than helping her overcome her weaknesses, because we all have areas in which we&rsquo;re weak. But a writer makes her name on her strengths, not her weaknesses, because her fans read her work in order to experience those strengths.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s a writer&rsquo;s critique group. But you really don&rsquo;t know how criticism feels until you get your first unfair review— that reviewer who doesn&rsquo;t just dislike your story, but dislikes you personally. He doesn&rsquo;t just disagree with what you&rsquo;ve written, but rather thinks you yourself are a charlatan. And he may not have even read your book. Every author has gotten such a review at least once, and as soon as you do, you can say you&rsquo;ve arrived. <em>That&rsquo;s</em> when a thick skin really comes in handy.</p>
<p>Despite the thick skin, it gets easier to be criticized as much as it gets easier to be turned down for a date. In other words, it doesn&rsquo;t get easier. You just get used to it— maybe.</p>
<p>Or more likely, you don&rsquo;t.</p>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
